<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Far Away (2nd week)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oxfordtheatrereview.com/2010/01/27/far-away-2nd-week/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oxfordtheatrereview.com/2010/01/27/far-away-2nd-week/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 01:14:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John927</title>
		<link>http://www.oxfordtheatrereview.com/2010/01/27/far-away-2nd-week/comment-page-1/#comment-260</link>
		<dc:creator>John927</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 17:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oxfordtheatrereview.com/?p=969#comment-260</guid>
		<description>Very nice site! &lt;a href=&quot;http://apeoixy.com/xqqasx/1.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;is it yours too&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice site! <a href="http://apeoixy.com/xqqasx/1.html" rel="nofollow">is it yours too</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeanne Arouet</title>
		<link>http://www.oxfordtheatrereview.com/2010/01/27/far-away-2nd-week/comment-page-1/#comment-245</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeanne Arouet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 13:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oxfordtheatrereview.com/?p=969#comment-245</guid>
		<description>I thought the play was very nicely directed, but must say that the position of the video installation was indeed unfortunate. 
Note to the directors: Half of the audience could not see it properly, and this did have an affect in terms of the audience&#039;s (lack of) engagement with the play.

I wouldn&#039;t agree with Ms. Turner&#039;s view that the play lacks plot and substance. I think Churchill knew what she was doing. 

However, the production could have done with more committment to the script, more physicality, and a deeper exploration of the various relationships, in particular that of Joan and her aunt. I felt that a lot of the first scene&#039;s potential remained unexplored between the two actresses.

While I tremendously enjoyed Cassie Barraclough&#039;s fantastic performance as Joan, Annie James looked uncomfortable and out of her depth as aunt Harper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the play was very nicely directed, but must say that the position of the video installation was indeed unfortunate.<br />
Note to the directors: Half of the audience could not see it properly, and this did have an affect in terms of the audience&#8217;s (lack of) engagement with the play.</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t agree with Ms. Turner&#8217;s view that the play lacks plot and substance. I think Churchill knew what she was doing. </p>
<p>However, the production could have done with more committment to the script, more physicality, and a deeper exploration of the various relationships, in particular that of Joan and her aunt. I felt that a lot of the first scene&#8217;s potential remained unexplored between the two actresses.</p>
<p>While I tremendously enjoyed Cassie Barraclough&#8217;s fantastic performance as Joan, Annie James looked uncomfortable and out of her depth as aunt Harper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
